Polyester vs Nylon for Activewear: Technical Comparison
Polyester and nylon dominate synthetic activewear fabrics, but which is better? The answer depends on your priorities: cost-effectiveness, hand feel, specific performance needs, and market positioning.
Chemical and Physical Properties
Polyester (PET - Polyethylene Terephthalate)
Chemical Structure: Ester linkages between repeating units Source: Petroleum-derived (or recycled PET bottles)
Physical Properties:
- Specific gravity: 1.38
- Moisture regain: <0.4%
- Melting point: 255-260°C
- Tensile strength: Good
- Abrasion resistance: Good
Nylon (Polyamide)
Chemical Structure: Amide linkages between repeating units Source: Petroleum-derived Types: Nylon 6, Nylon 6.6 most common
Physical Properties:
- Specific gravity: 1.14 (lighter than polyester)
- Moisture regain: 4.0-4.5% (absorbs some moisture)
- Melting point: 215-220°C (lower than polyester)
- Tensile strength: Excellent (strongest synthetic)
- Abrasion resistance: Excellent (best synthetic)
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Property | Polyester | Nylon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture-Wicking | Excellent (wicks, doesn't absorb) | Very Good (slight absorption) | Polyester |
| Drying Speed | 2-3 hours | 3-4 hours | Polyester |
| Strength | Good | Excellent (20% stronger) | Nylon |
| Abrasion Resistance | Good | Excellent | Nylon |
| Hand Feel (Softness) | Good (modern very soft) | Excellent (naturally softer) | Nylon |
| UV Resistance | Excellent | Fair (degrades faster) | Polyester |
| Chlorine Resistance | Excellent | Fair (yellows, degrades) | Polyester |
| Cost | Lower | Higher (20-35% more) | Polyester |
| Color Retention | Excellent | Very Good | Polyester |
| Wrinkle Resistance | Excellent | Very Good | Polyester |
| Odor Resistance | Fair (both can retain odor) | Fair | Tie |
Detailed Property Analysis
Moisture Management
Polyester:
- Hydrophobic (water-repelling)
- Moisture regain: <0.4%
- Wicks moisture to surface
- Stays dry during activity
- Dries in 2-3 hours
Nylon:
- Slightly hydrophilic (absorbs ~4% moisture)
- Still wicks well (better than cotton)
- Feels slightly damp when wet
- Dries in 3-4 hours
Winner: Polyester for pure moisture management
Application:
- Hot yoga: Polyester preferred
- Running in heat: Polyester preferred
- General gym: Either works well
Strength and Durability
Tensile Strength:
- Nylon: ~20% stronger than polyester
- Both excellent for activewear
Abrasion Resistance:
- Nylon: Superior (30-40% better)
- Polyester: Good
Practical Impact:
- Nylon better for: Yoga pants (friction on mats/floors), climbing wear, high-abrasion applications
- Polyester adequate for: Most activewear, tops, shorts
Winner: Nylon for maximum durability
Hand Feel and Comfort
Nylon:
- Naturally softer, smoother
- Silkier hand feel
- "Buttery soft" easier to achieve
- Premium tactile experience
Polyester:
- Modern polyester very soft (technology improved)
- Cotton-like modifications available
- Slightly more "technical" feel
- Still comfortable
Winner: Nylon for hand feel
Market Impact:
- Premium yoga wear: Nylon preferred (HD8578: 80/20 Nylon/Spandex)
- Performance sportswear: Polyester acceptable
- Luxury activewear: Nylon commands premium
Cost Analysis
Raw Material Cost (2026):
- Polyester: Baseline
- Nylon: +20-35% cost
Fabric Cost Example (FOB China):
- Polyester/Spandex (85/15, 200gsm): $3.50-4.00/meter
- Nylon/Spandex (80/20, 210gsm): $4.50-6.00/meter
Retail Impact:
- Polyester leggings: $40-70 retail
- Nylon leggings: $70-120 retail
Winner: Polyester for cost-effectiveness
UV and Chemical Resistance
UV Resistance:
- Polyester: Excellent (minimal degradation)
- Nylon: Fair (degrades faster in sunlight)
Chlorine Resistance:
- Polyester: Excellent (pool/hot tub suitable)
- Nylon: Poor (yellows, loses strength)
Winner: Polyester for outdoor/pool use
Application:
- Outdoor running: Polyester better
- Swimwear: Polyester essential
- Indoor yoga: Either works
Environmental Considerations
Recycling:
- Polyester: Widely recyclable (rPET from bottles)
- Nylon: Recycling emerging but less established
Sustainability:
- Recycled polyester widely available
- Recycled nylon (Econyl) growing but limited
Biodegradability:
- Neither biodegrades (both synthetic)
Winner: Polyester (recycling infrastructure)
When to Choose Polyester
Ideal Applications:
Running and High-Intensity Sports
- Maximum moisture-wicking critical
- Quick-dry important
- Cost-effective for volume
Hot Yoga
- Moisture management priority
- Quick-drying essential
- Chlorine resistance (some studios use pools)
Swimwear/Pool Activities
- Chlorine resistance essential
- UV resistance important
Budget/Value-Oriented Brands
- Lower cost enables competitive pricing
- Good performance at accessible price
Outdoor Activewear
- UV resistance matters
- All-weather performance
Huada Polyester Products: All Huada products are polyester-based, optimized for activewear performance at accessible pricing.
When to Choose Nylon
Ideal Applications:
Premium Yoga Wear
- Soft hand feel priority
- Luxury positioning
- Customers willing to pay premium
Leggings (High-End)
- Superior abrasion resistance (mat/floor friction)
- Buttery soft feel
- Premium market ($80-120 retail)
Activewear with High Abrasion
- Climbing pants
- High-friction areas
- Maximum durability needed
Luxury Athleisure
- Premium soft aesthetic
- High-end market positioning
- Elevated tactile experience
Huada Nylon Product: HD8578 Lycra Yoga Fabric (210gsm, 80% Nylon / 20% Spandex)
- Premium buttery-soft feel
- Excellent for high-end yoga wear
- Superior hand feel
- Justifies premium pricing
Blends and Combinations
Polyester/Nylon Blends: Rare in activewear; typically one or the other
Both with Spandex:
- Polyester/Spandex: 85/15, 80/20 typical
- Nylon/Spandex: 80/20, 75/25 typical
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Scenario: 1,000 Yoga Pants
Option A: Polyester/Spandex (85/15, 220gsm)
- Fabric: $3.80/meter
- Cost per pant: ~$2.50
- Total fabric cost: $2,500
- Retail price: $50-70
- Positioning: Mid-market
Option B: Nylon/Spandex (80/20, 210gsm - HD8578)
- Fabric: $5.20/meter
- Cost per pant: ~$3.40
- Total fabric cost: $3,400
- Retail price: $80-120
- Positioning: Premium
Analysis:
- Extra $900 fabric cost
- Enables $30-50 higher retail price
- Profit increase: $29,100-49,100 (on 1,000 units)
- ROI on premium fabric: 3,200-5,400%
Conclusion: Nylon investment justified for premium positioning
Consumer Perception
Survey Data (Activewear Purchasers):
- Can feel difference between nylon/polyester: 68%
- Willing to pay premium for nylon: 52%
- Prioritize performance over feel: 47%
- Prioritize feel over performance: 38%
Interpretation:
- Nylon's soft feel is perceivable value-add
- Premium pricing supported by consumer preference
- Performance-focused segment still large (polyester)
Conclusion
Polyester excels in moisture-wicking, quick-drying, UV/chlorine resistance, and cost-effectiveness—ideal for performance sportswear, running, hot yoga, and value-oriented brands. Nylon offers superior softness, strength, and abrasion resistance—perfect for premium yoga wear, luxury athleisure, and high-end leggings.
Key Takeaways:
- Polyester for performance & value - Better moisture management, lower cost
- Nylon for premium feel - Softer, justifies higher pricing
- Moisture-wicking: Polyester wins - Lower moisture regain
- Hand feel: Nylon wins - Naturally softer
- Cost: Polyester 20-35% cheaper - Enables competitive pricing
- Premium positioning: Nylon enables $30-50 higher retail - ROI justified
At Huada Creation, we offer both: polyester-based fabrics across our range for performance and value, plus HD8578 Lycra Yoga (80/20 Nylon/Spandex) for brands targeting the premium yoga market.
Compare Options:
- HD8193 Anta Stretch (Polyester/Spandex) - Performance value
- HD8578 Lycra Yoga (Nylon/Spandex) - Premium soft
- View All Fabrics
