Back to Blog
Comparison Guide

Polyester vs Nylon for Activewear: Technical Comparison

Premium nylon-spandex fabric showing buttery-soft texture for luxury activewear
ttt ttt
tttt

Polyester vs Nylon for Activewear: Technical Comparison

Polyester and nylon dominate synthetic activewear fabrics, but which is better? The answer depends on your priorities: cost-effectiveness, hand feel, specific performance needs, and market positioning.

Chemical and Physical Properties

Polyester (PET - Polyethylene Terephthalate)

Chemical Structure: Ester linkages between repeating units Source: Petroleum-derived (or recycled PET bottles)

Physical Properties:

  • Specific gravity: 1.38
  • Moisture regain: <0.4%
  • Melting point: 255-260°C
  • Tensile strength: Good
  • Abrasion resistance: Good

Nylon (Polyamide)

Chemical Structure: Amide linkages between repeating units Source: Petroleum-derived Types: Nylon 6, Nylon 6.6 most common

Physical Properties:

  • Specific gravity: 1.14 (lighter than polyester)
  • Moisture regain: 4.0-4.5% (absorbs some moisture)
  • Melting point: 215-220°C (lower than polyester)
  • Tensile strength: Excellent (strongest synthetic)
  • Abrasion resistance: Excellent (best synthetic)

Head-to-Head Comparison

Property Polyester Nylon Winner
Moisture-Wicking Excellent (wicks, doesn't absorb) Very Good (slight absorption) Polyester
Drying Speed 2-3 hours 3-4 hours Polyester
Strength Good Excellent (20% stronger) Nylon
Abrasion Resistance Good Excellent Nylon
Hand Feel (Softness) Good (modern very soft) Excellent (naturally softer) Nylon
UV Resistance Excellent Fair (degrades faster) Polyester
Chlorine Resistance Excellent Fair (yellows, degrades) Polyester
Cost Lower Higher (20-35% more) Polyester
Color Retention Excellent Very Good Polyester
Wrinkle Resistance Excellent Very Good Polyester
Odor Resistance Fair (both can retain odor) Fair Tie

Detailed Property Analysis

Moisture Management

Polyester:

  • Hydrophobic (water-repelling)
  • Moisture regain: <0.4%
  • Wicks moisture to surface
  • Stays dry during activity
  • Dries in 2-3 hours

Nylon:

  • Slightly hydrophilic (absorbs ~4% moisture)
  • Still wicks well (better than cotton)
  • Feels slightly damp when wet
  • Dries in 3-4 hours

Winner: Polyester for pure moisture management

Application:

  • Hot yoga: Polyester preferred
  • Running in heat: Polyester preferred
  • General gym: Either works well

Strength and Durability

Tensile Strength:

  • Nylon: ~20% stronger than polyester
  • Both excellent for activewear

Abrasion Resistance:

  • Nylon: Superior (30-40% better)
  • Polyester: Good

Practical Impact:

  • Nylon better for: Yoga pants (friction on mats/floors), climbing wear, high-abrasion applications
  • Polyester adequate for: Most activewear, tops, shorts

Winner: Nylon for maximum durability

Hand Feel and Comfort

Nylon:

  • Naturally softer, smoother
  • Silkier hand feel
  • "Buttery soft" easier to achieve
  • Premium tactile experience

Polyester:

  • Modern polyester very soft (technology improved)
  • Cotton-like modifications available
  • Slightly more "technical" feel
  • Still comfortable

Winner: Nylon for hand feel

Market Impact:

  • Premium yoga wear: Nylon preferred (HD8578: 80/20 Nylon/Spandex)
  • Performance sportswear: Polyester acceptable
  • Luxury activewear: Nylon commands premium

Cost Analysis

Raw Material Cost (2026):

  • Polyester: Baseline
  • Nylon: +20-35% cost

Fabric Cost Example (FOB China):

  • Polyester/Spandex (85/15, 200gsm): $3.50-4.00/meter
  • Nylon/Spandex (80/20, 210gsm): $4.50-6.00/meter

Retail Impact:

  • Polyester leggings: $40-70 retail
  • Nylon leggings: $70-120 retail

Winner: Polyester for cost-effectiveness

UV and Chemical Resistance

UV Resistance:

  • Polyester: Excellent (minimal degradation)
  • Nylon: Fair (degrades faster in sunlight)

Chlorine Resistance:

  • Polyester: Excellent (pool/hot tub suitable)
  • Nylon: Poor (yellows, loses strength)

Winner: Polyester for outdoor/pool use

Application:

  • Outdoor running: Polyester better
  • Swimwear: Polyester essential
  • Indoor yoga: Either works

Environmental Considerations

Recycling:

  • Polyester: Widely recyclable (rPET from bottles)
  • Nylon: Recycling emerging but less established

Sustainability:

  • Recycled polyester widely available
  • Recycled nylon (Econyl) growing but limited

Biodegradability:

  • Neither biodegrades (both synthetic)

Winner: Polyester (recycling infrastructure)

When to Choose Polyester

Ideal Applications:

  1. Running and High-Intensity Sports

    • Maximum moisture-wicking critical
    • Quick-dry important
    • Cost-effective for volume
  2. Hot Yoga

    • Moisture management priority
    • Quick-drying essential
    • Chlorine resistance (some studios use pools)
  3. Swimwear/Pool Activities

    • Chlorine resistance essential
    • UV resistance important
  4. Budget/Value-Oriented Brands

    • Lower cost enables competitive pricing
    • Good performance at accessible price
  5. Outdoor Activewear

    • UV resistance matters
    • All-weather performance

Huada Polyester Products: All Huada products are polyester-based, optimized for activewear performance at accessible pricing.

When to Choose Nylon

Ideal Applications:

  1. Premium Yoga Wear

    • Soft hand feel priority
    • Luxury positioning
    • Customers willing to pay premium
  2. Leggings (High-End)

    • Superior abrasion resistance (mat/floor friction)
    • Buttery soft feel
    • Premium market ($80-120 retail)
  3. Activewear with High Abrasion

    • Climbing pants
    • High-friction areas
    • Maximum durability needed
  4. Luxury Athleisure

    • Premium soft aesthetic
    • High-end market positioning
    • Elevated tactile experience

Huada Nylon Product: HD8578 Lycra Yoga Fabric (210gsm, 80% Nylon / 20% Spandex)

  • Premium buttery-soft feel
  • Excellent for high-end yoga wear
  • Superior hand feel
  • Justifies premium pricing

Blends and Combinations

Polyester/Nylon Blends: Rare in activewear; typically one or the other

Both with Spandex:

  • Polyester/Spandex: 85/15, 80/20 typical
  • Nylon/Spandex: 80/20, 75/25 typical

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Scenario: 1,000 Yoga Pants

Option A: Polyester/Spandex (85/15, 220gsm)

  • Fabric: $3.80/meter
  • Cost per pant: ~$2.50
  • Total fabric cost: $2,500
  • Retail price: $50-70
  • Positioning: Mid-market

Option B: Nylon/Spandex (80/20, 210gsm - HD8578)

  • Fabric: $5.20/meter
  • Cost per pant: ~$3.40
  • Total fabric cost: $3,400
  • Retail price: $80-120
  • Positioning: Premium

Analysis:

  • Extra $900 fabric cost
  • Enables $30-50 higher retail price
  • Profit increase: $29,100-49,100 (on 1,000 units)
  • ROI on premium fabric: 3,200-5,400%

Conclusion: Nylon investment justified for premium positioning

Consumer Perception

Survey Data (Activewear Purchasers):

  • Can feel difference between nylon/polyester: 68%
  • Willing to pay premium for nylon: 52%
  • Prioritize performance over feel: 47%
  • Prioritize feel over performance: 38%

Interpretation:

  • Nylon's soft feel is perceivable value-add
  • Premium pricing supported by consumer preference
  • Performance-focused segment still large (polyester)

Conclusion

Polyester excels in moisture-wicking, quick-drying, UV/chlorine resistance, and cost-effectiveness—ideal for performance sportswear, running, hot yoga, and value-oriented brands. Nylon offers superior softness, strength, and abrasion resistance—perfect for premium yoga wear, luxury athleisure, and high-end leggings.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Polyester for performance & value - Better moisture management, lower cost
  2. Nylon for premium feel - Softer, justifies higher pricing
  3. Moisture-wicking: Polyester wins - Lower moisture regain
  4. Hand feel: Nylon wins - Naturally softer
  5. Cost: Polyester 20-35% cheaper - Enables competitive pricing
  6. Premium positioning: Nylon enables $30-50 higher retail - ROI justified

At Huada Creation, we offer both: polyester-based fabrics across our range for performance and value, plus HD8578 Lycra Yoga (80/20 Nylon/Spandex) for brands targeting the premium yoga market.


Compare Options:

ttt